April 2008


art.building.afp.gi.jpg

If a story was brought to a movie producer about a father who imprisons his daughter for nearly a quarter of a century, rapes her constantly over that period, and out of that abuse comes not one, but seven children, the producer would find it way too fantastic, and laugh the creator out of the office. I am beyond any logical words in saying that this story is true.

In Austria this week, the above details did happen to a young woman who was 18 years old at the time. Her father abducted her, locked her in a cellar and repeatedly raped her, allowing children to be born into this prison of a world, and suffer alongside their mother; his daughter.

We hear of abuse cases all the time, and everytime it is tragic, and deperately upsetting. But this case goes beyond disturbing, and you have to seriously wonder what has gone through the mind of this man that he even thought of, let alone went through with, this hideous, evil act.

Unfortunately, these bizarre, tragic events are frighteningly not uncommon, and I can now understand why a close friend of mine, true crime author Vikki Petraitis, is fascinated with these sorts of crimes, and the mind of the perpetrator. Apart from being disgusted and appalled beyond belief, we do have a morbid curiosity. We want, if not need, to know why anyone could ever do this.

We all have a very clear idea about what we see as a crime; especially an horrific crime. But something like this puts us in a place we simply cannot fathom at any level. A different case, but similar in its extraordinary level of twistedness and horror, was the case of the German man who wanted to eat someone. Amazingly, he went into an internet chat room and found like minded people. He then finds someone, and, without going into the gory – and it was gory – details, fulfils his fantasy, resulting obviously in the death of his willing partner.

There is one burning question that we all ask when we hear or see something like this. Why? We all have moments when our minds travel slightly outside the norm, whether they be sexual fantasies, or fantasies of some other kind. But most of us have limits, and know when something is just not right. What was this father thinking? How long was he planning to do this for? Why did he feel compelled to do this? How could he continue his own life upstairs, while he had a virtual community living in the cellar?

The most tragic thing about this case is the daughter and her six children/brothers & sisters(one died shortly after birth). After 24 years of unspeakable abuse, and horror, it will not be possible for them to even vaguely achieve a normal existence. What about the mother, the man’s wife, who was totally oblivious to all that was going on? What mental anguish would she be going through?

With cases like this, our minds simply do not have the capacity to cope with the complexities. It is so far outside the realms of our understanding, that we simply sit, watch, read, listen, and try to come to grips with the fact that while we were enjoying ourselves in all sorts of ways over the last 24 years, one woman was suffering beyond all measure. Through all the changes that come with the passage of time, her changes have consisted of a new child’s face.

All we can hope for is that in some way, just some way, this tragic family can find some semblance of inner peace, and that this animal of a human being who calls himself a ‘father’, receives the harshest penalty that the Austrian justice system can allow. Do I want him dead? Oh no. I want him to spend the rest of his life in amongst the common prison population, who would be fully aware of exactly what he is in there for. That is far, far worse than a death sentence.

Enjoy your day.

                   

I have been very interested recently in the veritable flood of books coming out sprouting an atheist manifesto. Authors such as Richard Dawkins, Christopher Hitchens and Michel Onfray seem to be competing for who is the more accurate atheist, or who can ‘crucify’ – for want of a better word –  organised religion the best.

Even though I am not an atheist, in my blogroll I have two very famous ones, Bill Maher from the US and Phillip Adams from Australia, so I am never far away from the latest in atheistic thought. However, even though I believe the abovementioned purveyers of godlessness have some good points to raise, I am also critical of them, and it has nothing to do with Allah, God, Yahweh, Vishnu or Jesus.

What these three gentlemen are ‘preaching’ is that there is no God, and that we are silly buggers if we swallow the nonsense. Christopher Hitchens’ latest book ‘God is not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything’, looks at how religion can control everything we do, and in essence, can poison us and everything we touch.

“In Belfast, Hitchens saw locals terrorised for “no other reason than membership of another confession”. In Belgrade, he’d seen Croatian Roman Catholics slug it out with Christian Orthodox Serbs. In Beirut, a suicide bomber’s severed head stared at him in the street outside the French embassy. And so on….Rather than target one weak point hard, Hitchens goes hard at them all: faith is condemned as an overrated virtue; the holy texts are a sham; religious metaphysics are false; intelligent design is foolish; and, best argued of all, religious people are very, very dangerous.”

http://www.smh.com.au/news/book-reviews/god-is-not-great-how-religion-poisons-everything/2007/05/25/1179601648057.html

Religion can be a very scary thing if it dominates ones life and dictates ones actions. This has happened many times throughout the course of history. Christians in the deep south of the United States would hang you from the nearest tree if you said Jesus was a fruitcake. Extremists in the Islamic community will either deal you a death sentence or bomb whole sections of the community if your religious views don’t gel with theirs. Take the recent news coming out of Iran:

“Iran’s toy market is being inundated by models of Barbie, Batman, Spiderman and Harry Potter and the young must be protected from their harmful cultural effects, the nation’s prosecutor general was quoted as saying….Mr Dori Najafabadi’s comments came in a letter to an Iranian vice president, urging measures to protect “Islamic culture and revolutionary values”.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2008/04/27/2228540.htm

Hitchens and the others, even from just a simplistic view at a synopsis of the books on offer, make some valid points. What worries me, however, is the cocky arrogance that I have seen displayed from Dawkins, Hitchens, and the likes of Bill Maher. Part of their criticism is that religious nutters hold to their fundamentalism and this is what makes them dangerous. But what I think is dangerous is a level of arrogance that treats an innocent, simple living religious follower like he or she is a moronic, mindless fool. There is nothing wrong with a point of view, but please, let people believe what they want. Take task with the more extreme actions, not with the innocent day to day events of a local church, temple, mosque or synagogue. Arrogance and superiority only breeds contempt.

Religion does poison everything, but so do overconfident negative observers of the world.

Enjoy your day.

 

I am about to make an incredibly bold statement here and say none of the three Presidential candidates will do a good job; we just have to pick the one that will do the least damage.

I personally do not think any one of them knows what they are getting into. They have no clue. Hillary is living in the 90’s, McCain is still hunting the Viet Cong in the jungles of Vietnam, and Obama is channelling Dr. Martin Luther King and JFK, while trying to play down the fact that he is a filthy rich high class lawyer who has no idea how the other half live.

Come on, you may say, you are 100% behind Obama! Absolutely, is my response back to that observation. But that doesn’t mean that I think he will be flawless. If he does not pick his team very, very carefully, he will cock this thing up BIG time. However, he has not made statements that show a distinct lack of awareness of the mistakes of the past and how we should learn from them. As my father always said “If you make a mistake once, it’s a mistake. If you make the same mistake a second time, you’re stupid.”

This week saw Senator Clinton declare that she would attack Iran if need be, as President. Good girl. Show some toughness. Show that you can be a nasty war mongerer like that mad Texan we have there now. It shows toughness, but has absolutely no intelligence. The war in Iraq is causing more people to hate politicians than any other issue. The United States military is going to find it difficult to get men and women to join after this little Middle East fiasco. It is a bloodbath, and the so called ‘liberation of Iraq’ has failed to ‘liberate’ one single Iraqi. So the answer to all that, is to declare war on another Middle Eastern country, completely destroy any military the United States has, and totally dessimate the American spirit?

With Hillary, you have a new war, and with John McCain, you are faced with the same war for ‘at least 100 years’, as he favours another loose end like in Korea.

Obama, needs to do some serious homework if he is to give the people of the US some real hope. He has to have a plan about North Korea, about Iran, about the Middle East, and not just ‘end the war in Iraq.’ The American people do not want more hostility, and bloodshed, but they will choose that over a young, naive man like Barack Obama, if push comes to shove.

To win the nomination is one thing. To then get down to the realism of what you’re going to do with this nightmarish world when you get the job is entirely different again.

Enjoy your day.

Yesterday, Australians and New Zealanders celebrated Anzac Day. ANZAC stands for Australian and New Zealand Army Corps, and it has a number of major significances for these two countries.

Anzac Day is held on the 25th April, as this was the day the Australian and New Zealand troops stormed the beaches of Gallipoli, Turkey in 1915. It was a monumental military fiasco, and some would wonder why we use that event to remember. Surely, we would rather forget.

Well, it was the first time Australians and New Zealanders had fought alongside one another, and an amazing bond was formed that is summed up in one word; Anzac. As a child growing up, I was told of the Anzac spirit, and how we should be proud of those who fought in Gallipoli, as their pure guts and determination inspired those who fought in successive wars.

It is significant for another reason. It is the only ‘official’ day that we celebrate and remember our war dead. It is a public holiday, and marches are held in all parts of the country. Dawn Services are held to begin the day, and it has become one of the proudest days of the year for veterans, as they get to shine up the medals, meet old mates, and remember those mates who never came home. The illegal game of ‘Two-up’ is allowed only on this day of the year, as a token gesture to the veterans. This was a betting game played in the trenches and other war zones, and the only place you will ever see it played freely and openly is on Anzac Day. Otherwise, you’ll have to go to the many casinos dotted around the big brown land that is Australia.

Anzac Day has always meant a lot to me, as my Grandfather fought at Gallipoli. He was lucky enough to come home. According to my Mother, he always attended Anzac Day marches in his local country town. But he has been dead close on 40 years now, and I have always wanted to march in just one Anzac Day parade wearing his medals. Unfortunately, his more immediate, close family have pulled ranks around the medals, and try as I have for the last 20 years, the closest I have come to them is a photograph.

My desire to be the legs, mind and heart of my Grandfather and continue the Anzac spirit on his behalf, is also the desire of many. Children, grandchildren, nephews and nieces all over Australia and New Zealand want to march for their loved family member. But I know for a fact that in Australia, this practice has been heavily discouraged, both for Grandchildren marching with Grandfathers or relatives marching in place of deceased veterans. A part of me is simply sad, another part of me is furious. Those servicemen who returned want the Anzac spirit maintained, but do nothing to help facilitate it. One good thing, however. The old diggers who stop us now, cannot stop us forever.

So, as we say at each Anzac Day:

  They shall grow not old as we that are left grow old.

                 Age shall not weary them or the years condemn.

                             At the going down of the sun and in the morning.

                                    We will remember them.

                                  Lest we forget

 Enjoy your day.

              

I don’t know about you, but lately I have been seeing very sudden crises happen all around the world. One day, things are a bit dodgy, but ok, and the next, we are in the middle of a full on crisis of dramatic proportions.

The Sub Prime mortgage crisis in the US, sort of came out of the blue, and now we find that we are hit with a world food crisis, and it’s serious. Prices of food all around the world are rising, and the blame is being lumped onto, of all people, farmers who are attempting to make our world a better place to be, via the production of bio-fuels.

All this time, we have been celebrating bio-fuel technology, and we have marvelled at how we can now run so many things on the juice of a lemon! We have been pleased with our technological advancements, and scientists have been proud as punch at helping to make a real contribution to a cleaner, greener world.

But alas, we now find out that there are millions of acres of crops that are meant solely for bio-fuel use, not for human consumption. People are starving all over the world, some in a neighbouring country to bio- fuel producers, but that abundant field of yumminess is not going anywhere near their lips. It will help to fuel their car, though, if they had one. Oh, that’s right, they don’t have a car. They can’t even afford a bowl of rice! Comedian Robin Williams said when his wife was pregnant, her breasts were getting larger, and he was hoping for playtime. His wife defensively states “No, they’re for the baby!” Just like Robin, those who need food most are disappointed and disillusioned that they can see heaven, they just can’t touch it.

So, we are faced with a real dilemma. Forget the environment and feed people, or contribute to the starvation of millions around the world and help save the planet. Not much of a choice. Someone needs to come up with a solution that will sustain both.

Has any seen Al Gore around?

Enjoy your day.

 

                              

Hillary Clinton has won the Pennsylvania Primary, which was expected. To get over excited about it is a bit silly. From what I have heard, Pennsylvania has never voted anyone of colour to major office. If Obama had been white with his level of popularity, Hillary would NOT have won Pennsylvania. As a matter of fact, she would have been out of the race a long time ago.

She won by close to 10 percentage points. Analysts have stated that if she does not get higher than 10 percentage points, then her campaign is stagnant, and has not developed new momentum. So where does that leave us? Back to where we were before this particular Primary.

Hillary ain’t dropping out. Obama is staying on course. And McCain is sitting back resting up for whichever tired, worn out candidate wins this incredible struggle. He is the big winner out of all this.

Rumours are still abounding about a Clinton/Obama or Obama/Clinton Pres and V-Pres ticket. I agree with Bill Clinton. It would be an unbeatable ticket. McCain would not have a chance against the combined force. However, it will never happen, and even if it did, it would never work. Why? Ego, that’s why.

Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama have lots of things going for them, but their most overwhelming shared trait is they have bigger egos than Prince Charles’ ears. Neither of them is going to be second fiddle to the other. It won’t happen, and neither it should. We all know that Bill is going to be Hillary’s real VP, and Michelle Obama is going to be Barack’s, as Hillary was to Bill. Whoever gets VP in either case is going to be a figurehead, not someone chosen to be an active member of the team.

Obama has a lead that Hillary cannot beat, even if she wins every Primary and Caucus from now till the convention. It logically points to an Obama nomination. But I have a very weird, sneaking suspicion that Hillary will get the nomination, as the ’superdelegates’ go against public support and give her the nod. Obama will be furious, and if the Democrats do not play it carefully, they will be out of office for another 8 years.

Enjoy your day.

Call me way behind the rest of the world, but I have just watched Al Gore’s documentary “An Inconvenient Truth”, and it spoke to me in ways far beyond simply the environment.

Al Gore is one of those people that does not seem the most dynamic. As I started watching the documentary, I must admit to being bored, and I thought “I should really watch this, but it’s a bit dull.” As I kept watching, I noticed myself settling more into my couch, even changing positions for a long stay, and became mesmerised by the information that this man was presenting. Apart from the overwhelming scientific statistics that he presents to prove that the earth is on a downward slide, Gore’s key message goes beyond the statistics. It is a deep seated thorn in his side that compels him to do something when faced with inarguable facts.

He told the story of his family, and how they used to farm tobacco. When his father found out what tobacco could do, he stopped farming it. His sister failed to give up smoking, however, and succumbed to lung cancer. Both his father and his sister were faced with ‘an inconvenient truth’. One decided to act, the other didn’t.

How many truths in our lives are ‘inconvenient’. Listening to a recent podcast, the host was talking about addiction, in all its forms, and said that “our addictions will eventually kill us.” This host had become an alcoholic, and if he didn’t do something about it, after seeing the ‘inconvenient truth’ that he was out of control, not a pleasant person to be around, and the simple fact that it was destroying him, he bluntly states that he would be dead. An ‘inconvenient truth’ that is not acted upon will cause us to die, whether that be physically, emotionally, spiritually, mentally, or socially.

Al Gore’s message goes far beyond the environment, and that is why this documentary is more than just a pep talk about recycling, planting trees, and driving our cars less. It’s about having the guts to admit some truths in any part of our lives are inconvenient, and we have to admit that to ourselves. It follows the old adage ‘no pain, no gain.’ Al Gore challenges us to be strong enough to face the painful decisions, as does this particular podcaster, otherwise the consequences will be dire.

Enjoy your day.

 

I am unashameadly left in my view of politics, if you hadn’t worked that out already. I am not, however, unintelligent and narrow in my thinking. Last weekend’s 2020 Summit, held in Canberra, Australia, was a meeting of some of the best minds in their field, and it offends me – no – disgusts me, to have small minded conservatives treat anyone who does not think like them, as naughty children with way too much to say.

Alexander Downer, former Australian Foreign Affairs Minister in the now defunct Howard Conservative government, has gone on the warpath today in support of Australia remaining a Constitutional Monarchy. He has labelled the 2020 Summit, and I quote “…a left gabfest”. Why? Because there were no conservatives there. Little Alexander didn’t get an invite, and neither did any of his colleagues because this summit was about what everyone can do for the future of Australia. The conservatives don’t like everyone having a say. They stick to the tried and true method of keeping the masses quiet, in their place, and lower than them.

Well, the masses spoke this weekend, and the conservatives didn’t like it. Mr. Downer was speaking at a Monarchist event and maybe spoilt little Alexander felt the other kids in the playground got to play too much, and now it was his turn. So the ’scoffing’ began. My friend and fellow blogger has recently written a great post on this very topic, and I will add to it by saying that when people ’scoff’, ‘look down their nose’, ‘ridicule’ and ‘patronise’, it is a definite sign of ego being deflated, and a loss of anything worthwhile to say. They think they can ‘put you back in your box’.

Well, I would like to see him put Sir William Deane, highly respected former Governor-General, back in his box. Or high profile businessman Lindsay Fox. Both of these men attended the summit. Bitter little Alexander has fallen from grace, and he needs his time to stand in the middle of the living room and have a tantrum. Of course he chose to have that tantrum at a Monarchist’s dinner, where everyone patted him on the head, gave him a lollipop and said ‘It’s alright, Alexander dear, we still love you.”

When the mighty fall, they usually sit there for a while, crying. Little Alexander needs to be told to get up off the floor, return to his privileged wealthy life in Adelaide, and give back to Australia in a postive way; by closing his mouth, and promising never to open it again.

I can’t embed his speech here, but go to http://www.abc.net.au/news/video/and search the word ‘downer’.

Or if you just want to watch my favourite satirists have a field day with Mr.Downer when he was Minister for Foreign Affairs, take a look.

Enjoy your day.

 

I was listening to a podcast today on the issue of Iraq. Now, I am the first person to say that I am tiring of Iraq stories. I know this is not very sympathetic, but one can only hear so many stories of  “12 killed in bombing in Basra”, before one feels it’s a broken record.

However, on Australian Journalist Phillip Adams’ nightly talk program ‘Late Night Live’, there was a  discussion about the issue of Iraqi refugees wanting to settle in the United States. Phillip was absolutely astonished at the amount of refugees the United States takes in. Out of 2,000,000 applications, it has to date taken in 1,680! Even Sweden took in 12,000 in 2007 alone! The major reason for knocking back applications had a lot to do with Iraqi’s being Muslim, which to George W Bush usually means ‘links to Al-Kaahda!”

How convenient it is to invade a country, totally ruin lives, and then say “sorry pal, find somewhere else to live”. The gentlemen that Phillip was interviewing, US Journalist and Novelist, George Packer, went on to say that even after Vietnam, the United States did more to help those wishing to escape after the fall of Saigon. Not this time, however.

But Packer went on to say how Iraqi’s volunteered as interpreters during the early days after the fall of Saddam, but when they asked for US government protection as they were in danger because they were seen as helping ‘the invaders’, they were barely allowed past the front desk of the ‘Green Zone’, and were given no added protection.

The candidates for the next US President can say all they want about troop withdrawal, and the end to the war, but the powers that be in this administration have created a gaping wound in the Middle East that simple troop withdrawal is not going to fix. The United States has raped this country and its people, destroyed its infrastructure, and then turned its backs on the Iraqis when they want out.

If Senator McCain becomes President, he will have a very hard time convincing America that the Iraq plan is a good one. If Senator Obama or Clinton get in, the fancy words have to stop, and some serious issues need to be tackled. This is a mess, and when you look at those refugee figures, you would have to say that its a mess the current United States government cares little about.

Let’s hope someone is accountable at a Human Rights trial in years to come, because it is going to be the biggest case ever to be heard, and only then will we find out the true extent of the damage.

Enjoy your day.

PM Kevin Rudd, Cate Blanchett, Hugh Jackman, and Minister for the Environment Peter Garrett at the “Towards a Creative Australia” session.

 Images courtesy of the Australian Government, Department of Prime Minister & Cabinet.

Well, Australia’s 2020 Summit is underway, and with enthusiastic participants at the ready, and post-it notes, whiteboard markers and ideas in full supply, this combined ‘brain’s trust’ is raring to go.

As I have stated in an earlier blog, this is a talkfest, and that will always be its biggest criticism. The delegates were spread across 10 areas – productivity, the economy, climate change, rural communities, health, indigenous Australia, welfare, creative arts, governance and security.Each of the 10 streams has been asked to come up with at least one big idea plus three concrete policy ideas – one of which must involve no or negligible cost.The government will respond to each recommendation by year’s end. ( http://news.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=450096 )

At least with this directive, it forces those present to come to some sort of consensus on the big issues.

But this summit seems to be more important than we all think. For the last 11 and a half years, Australian citizens have been locked out of knowing what is going on with Australia, and what Prime Minister Kevin Rudd seems to be doing is allowing everyday citizens, from all walks of life, to contribute to the future of their nation.

It hit me this morning that we always criticise politicians for ‘not listening to us’ and for being ‘out of touch’. Well, Kevin Rudd is listening, and he is not at all concerned if this summit is a failure. He seems to have the old ‘better to have tried and failed than never to have tried at all’ attitude. One participant stated this morning that out of this could come a couple of really good ideas that could change the country completely. And if you look at it that way, this weekend of brainstorming and debating issues that matter, could be a good thing. It will at least allow airing of issues that others might not have thought of before, and start people thinking.

The participants, too, don’t seem to be your normal bunch of ‘Oh God, we’re at a conference’ types. They have come into this very gung ho, and are seizing the opportunity to better Australia. Its guest list is very broad, from Cate Blanchett, to Lachlan Murdoch, to former Governor-General Sir William Deane to marathon man Robert de Castella. These famous names are joined by participants who work at the grass roots level of their particular field, so things will be kept real.

Depite my intial skepticism, I am willing to give this thing a go. Let it come to a conclusion tomorrow and see what has come of it. You just never know. Kevin might have hit on a winner here.

Enjoy your day.

 

Next Page »