


The latest Pit Bull Terrier attack on a woman in Perth, Western Australia, has yet again highlighted to me that this is a breed that is good for nothing, and a breed that should be made extinct.
The American Pit Bull Terrier is a fighting dog. It is what is was bred for. It is extremely aggressive, and according to Dr. Hugh Wirth, Australian RSPCA President, has no redeeming qualities at all.
Dr Wirth said the American pit bull was a pure breed genetically designed for fighting.
“The problem we’ve got in Australia is we’ve got a large number of irresponsible dog owners of American pit bull terriers who refuse to recognise the potential of the dog as a fighting, aggressive machine,” he said.
“(They) don’t keep this very special dog in a way that it can not possibly hurt any member of the community, or any other animal for that matter.”
“The problem is these dogs are bred solely to fight, so they have a very low threshold of tolerance of other dogs and if they feel as though they’re threatened in any way, this genetic conditioning kicks in and they become a raging beast.They’ll attack anything they think is a threat to themselves, whether it’s a human or whether it’s another dog and they won’t stop attacking until that alleged threat to their safety disappears.”
http://thinkexist.com/quotes/hugh_wirth/
So, with this blatant slab of information from a qualified veterinarian, why do some people still want these dogs as pets? If they are only good for aggression and fighting, then why choose to live with a ticking time bomb? The woman who was attacked, was attacked by her boyfriend’s dog. The female Pit Bull that attacked her was destroyed, but the male who has yet to attack, still lives with her boyfriend. I am telling you now, if I was going out with someone and they had a Pit Bull, it would be a very clear case of, “The Pit Bull or me.” There is not a snowflake’s chance in hell that I would be anywhere near it.
However, famous American dog trainer, Cesar Millan, had this to say:
“My kids are around pit bulls every day. In the ’70s they blamed Dobermans, in the ’80s they blamed German shepherds, in the ’90s they blamed the Rottweiler. Now they blame the pit bull.”
Whilst this is true, Mr. Millan has had criticism from many circles about his own methods. So for him to state that Pit Bulls are fine, could send a wrong message to his viewers. He teaches a pack mentality, with the human being the head of the pack. Yes, the human needs to be seen as the ‘alpha dog’ or the leader, but I think Mr. Millan is ignoring the basic facts about this breed of dog compared to others that have received criticism, like the Doberman and the German Shepherd.
American Pit Bull Terriers often display dog aggression, especially towards unfamiliar dogs of the same sex or level of assertiveness. Early socialization and good training can mean that many individuals of the breed may not display this trait; however, there is no guarantee. Extra precautions can be taken with this type of dog to prevent any incidents. While an APBT may not start a fight, even the best socialized pit bulls generally do not tolerate as much from other dogs as other breeds might. As dogs bred never to back down from a fight, it is sometimes more responsible to avoid certain situations of interaction if the owner feels that he or she cannot handle the dog. A responsible owner should not let their dog interact with strange dogs unsupervised and should know how to avoid a dog fight.
Doberman Pinschers are, in general, gentle, loyal, loving, and intelligent dogs. Although there is variation in temperament, a typical pet Doberman attacks only if it has been mistreated or believes that it, its property, or its family are in danger.
German Shepherds have a personality marked by direct, fearless willingness to protect what it considers its “den” (i.e. house, car, and property in a home situation) and “pack” (i.e. human family in a home situation). It is poised, but when the occasion demands, eager and alert; both fit and willing to serve in its capacity as a companion, watchdog, guide dog for people who are blind, herding dog, or guardian, whichever the circumstances may demand.
As you can see, the other breeds that have had bad press over the years do have some redeeming qualities, and require only good socialization and training to be an acceptable member of the community. The American Pit Bull, however, may still be a stick of dynamite, even with proper training by an experienced handler.
I know that in most cases where a dog has gone off the rails, it is the owner who is at fault. Having had a dog, though a small one who would be only a danger to someone’s ankles, I know how much responsibility it takes to train them, socialize them, and keep them happy and stable. So I can honestly understand responsible owners of Pit Bulls jumping up and down at the call for the breed to be gotten rid of. But the question that has always sat in my head is, “Why would you want such an aggressive dog? What is it supposed to prove? What is its attraction?” There are plenty of other breeds that are just as ‘masculine’, ’strong’ and ‘powerful’ without being a severe threat to the community at large.
When the words of an RSPCA President echo the words of the standard description of the dog’s temperament, then Cesar Millan either knows something that we all don’t know, or he is ignoring the genetic facts that should be hitting him right between the eyes.
Enjoy your day.
June 24, 2008 at 6:16 am
Cesar Millan is ignoring the genetic facts. Even Randall Lockwood, the Senior Vice President of the ASPCA (American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals), clearly admits to the genetic traits. Yet, both Lockwood and the ASPCA aggressively oppose pit bull regulation.
http://dogsbite.wetpaint.com/page/Randall+Lockwood+Lawenforcement+Training+Video
The question we always ask is: Why do animal advocacy agencies (like the ASPCA) oppose pit bull regulation? The breed consistently kills and maims dogs, cats and other animals. The irony is outrageous. These groups have taken a stance to support pit bulls — which are indisputably animal-aggressive — at all cost, regardless of the countless animals pit bulls tear to pieces.
June 24, 2008 at 6:52 am
Also from that Wikipedia page:
“The APBT is a strong-willed, sturdy companion. It is a breed that is loyal to friends and family, and friendly to strangers. Under a firm hand, APBTs are obedient and show a high desire to please.”
“The American Pit Bull Terrier is a working dog and is suitable for a wide range of working disciplines due to their intelligence, high energy and endurance. In the United States they have been used as search and rescue dogs that save lives, police dogs performing narcotics and explosives detection, Border Patrol dogs, hearing dogs to provide services to the deaf as well as general service dogs.”
June 24, 2008 at 5:09 pm
Thank you both for your insights. I am very pleased that there are two sides of the argument represented here.
July 24, 2008 at 10:57 am
Wow, have you done any research on the other side of the fence? Half the reason they’re banned is the BS these politicians spout about locking jaws and completely made-up statistics. Most dog attacks are incorrectly identified as pit bull attacks because people are stupid – my friend was kicked out of her appartment because her show-winning dachshund was a “pit bull.” Even animal control officers can’t identify a pit bull versus various Labrador and Dachshund crosses. :/ Overall, breed bans will do NOTHING for anyone – irresponsible owners will continue to lock the dogs up in their garage, and responsible owners will mourn the loss of one of the best dog breeds ever known.
July 24, 2008 at 7:51 pm
Please tell me which part of the Wikipedia entry is BS, as I always go to that as a neutral, factual source of information, as do many people. I am quite open to being criticised for only taking the bad parts out of the article,but what you are saying is utter nonsense, pure and simple. A Dachshund being identified as a pit bull? Now that really is a stretch. You are obviously an owner and lover of Pit Bulls, so you don’t see their bad side. Go talk to most Veterinarians, and they will tell you the facts, not the “BS”.
August 10, 2008 at 11:53 am
HA HA and u r up tight forget what some other vet tells u straight up u got bit by a pit cause u r stupid and now want all of them got pits r the most protective dogs there r i know i own 6 pits my self and they play w kids and people jus fine unless those people r try’n to hurt me and if they r i’ll see them in hell bro what about all those little dogs that bite the shit out of u cause they have little man problems which i think u have try’n to get rid of a manly dog like the pit but it’s all in the way u rasie them there dick head
August 10, 2008 at 2:39 pm
And you are in charge of 6 pit bulls? Your honour, I rest my case.
November 12, 2008 at 3:25 am
Before you go slamming pitbulls maybe you should do a little more homework than media BS. I have a Pitbull Terrier whom is extremely gentle. She has been bitten by a Great Dane. Her response, she put her tail between her legs and ran the other way. She has been well socialized and we put a lot of work into making her the dog we want her to be. She is wonderful! Punish the deed not the breed! Why don’t you go after the drug dealers and idiots that are inbreeding these dogs to make them mean. If you do your homework you will find the bloodlines of the dogs that are attacking people are gaming bloodlines and bred just for that. There are many bloodlines that are not bred for hunting or aggression and these are great companion dogs. Why don’t we do away with all of the idiots in the world instead of the dogs. Then we wouldn’t have so many problem in the world.
February 14, 2009 at 10:44 pm
I am in the middle of this debate.
On one hand, I think owning pitbulls can be a very dangerous past time for those who don’t understand dogs and are anything but the most responsible and intelligent dog owners.
But on the other hand I think they are a breed with more potential to become dangerous if they are in the wrong hands.
So what do you do? Ban the breed to stop any irresposible people getting them, or perhaps put hefty regulations on those who own them?
Personally I know a couple of people who own pitbulls, and there is no way on earth I would go out to the backyard with them, or would like to encounter those dogs on a street. Unfortunatly the owners are the typical people who get a pitbull just because they are a ‘tough’ and ‘cool’ dog to get. They find it humerous that their dogs would demolish any stray animal that walked into their backyard.
I think these people are the main problems with pitbulls. I have no idea on statistics, and I don’t think it could be measured, but I think irresposible dog owners far outweigh the responsible ones, especially in terms of Pitbulls.
February 25, 2009 at 3:14 am
Firstly, wikipedia should never be used to support any arguments or statistics. The site can be edited by anyone and their brother.
Secondly, you’re not really looking at the other side of the fence. Responsible owners have socialized and trained their dogs. Owners who are serious about keeping their dogs ’safe’ but have never owned a pit research the breed to make sure they can handle it.
It’s irresponsible owners that get all the attention and they get it because they’ve mistreated/neglected/or trained the dog to be aggressive.
I’ve had a dog that was part pit bull and he was the friendliest, mellowist dog I’ve ever owned.
June 24, 2009 at 5:03 am
I think irresposible parents far outweigh the responsible ones. So does that mean we should only allow certain people to breed? Do you know how many children die at the hands of their parents? Do you know how many people start torturing animals before they turn their attention to other humans?